"In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." –John 16:33

Tag: liberalism

The difference between conservatives and liberals

A book by a guy named Jonathan Haidt just came out that describes what a lot of data says about the difference between conservatives and liberals. I tend to be pretty skeptical about liberal social research, but the conclusions of this work resonated with me. The premise is summed up in a quote from this article:

According to Haidt’s research, there are five things people care about:

  • avoidance of harm
  • fairness
  • loyalty
  • authority
  • sanctity

Conservatives care about all five in equal measure and liberals care about only the first two. Here is a quote from the book, as transcribed by The American Conservative:

“It’s as though conservatives can hear five octaves of music, but liberals respond to just two, within which they have become particularly discerning.”

There is a sixth thing which the book claims people care about, but for which liberals have a fundamentally different definition than conservatives. That is liberty. That was particularly enlightening. Here is another quote from this first article I saw on the new book (I read three. The other two are here and here.).

Conservatives tend to view liberty as the notion of being left alone to pursue happiness in whatever way they choose. Liberals tend to view it as the act of creating a level playing field for society’s most vulnerable individuals.

This very much rings true. I need to think about whether this gives me any additional insight about why liberals act they way they act. At first blush, I think it is something that thoughtful people, maybe even some liberals, have intuitively known all along.

Betty Blonde #302 – 09/14/2009
Betty Blonde #302
Click 
here or on the image to see full size strip.

Do liberals hate Christianity?

In quite a good article titled Why do so many liberals despise Christianity?, liberal author Damon Linker describes what I honestly believe is the current liberal zeitgeist. It seems like people who hold what would have been considered traditional liberal, Christian values not too many years ago are are no longer welcome at the table of the liberal “elites” who currently reign over much of government and higher academia. There are many reasons why this might have happened, but an argument can be made for the idea that scholarly rigor in the social sciences at the highest academic levels is dramatically diminished relative to what it was even before World War II. I enjoyed Linker’s article very much and believe the situation can only improve if views like his hold sway. He rightly notes that the preponderance of help in the current war against Ebola has come from Christians, but that that help is viewed with skepticism by many of the liberal elite is just wrong.

Betty Blonde #193 – 04/13/2009
Betty Blonde #193
Click 
here or on the image to see full size strip.

Daniel Greenfield and the Secular Religion of the Left at Sultan Knish

Day 903 of 1000

I just finished reading a great article titled The Secular Religion of the Left.  It is worth your while to read the whole thing.  It articulates some of the things we have seen in the downward spiral of our society.  An amazing connection is made between the culture malaise we see in parts of our own family who have immigrated here to the United States from Mexico and the idea that “Organic” food is somehow morally superior.  The premise of the article is that the religion of the secular left is materialism.  Here is the comment about immigrants that rings so true in light of our own personal experience:

Those most in need of the moral system of materialism are the descendants of the displaced, whether by immigration to the United States or migration within the United States from rural to urban areas, who have become detached from a large extended family structure that once sustained them.

Their grandparents had already loosened their grip on religion and as the family disintegrated, materialism took its place. Their grandparents worked hard to provide for their children, but the children no longer saw maintaining the family as a moral activity. Sometimes they didn’t even bother with a family. They became lonely individuals looking for a collective. A virtual political family.

Liberalism fills the missing space once inhabited by religion and the family. It provides a moral and ethical system as religion did and the accompanying sense of purpose and its state institutions replace and supplant the family. It does both of these things destructively and badly as its institutions forever try to patch social problems created by the disintegration of the family and its ideas provide too few people with a sense of purpose of a meaningful life.

Amazingly, the author, Daniel Greenfield, ties all this to the culture and religion of those who buy their organic food at Whole Foods.  And it is a coherent connection.  Whole Foods is a pretentious place.  Here is a snippet about that connection:

Organic, a category with a debatable meaning, doesn’t really provide that much more value. And environmental labels are worth very little. And yet the average product at Whole Foods is covered in so many “ethical liberal” labels that it’s hard to figure out what it even is.

He finishes the post with this brilliant gem:

The left can’t replace family or religion. Its social solutions are alien and artificial. They fix nothing and damage everything. Their appeal is to those who are arrogant and starved for meaning, who want religion without religion and family without family only to discover that they are not enough.

The quotes above are great, but do not come close to doing justice to the entire piece.  Read it.  I am adding Greenfield’s blog to my daily reading list.

Betty Blonde #67 – 10/17/2008
Betty Blonde #67
Click here or on the image to see full size strip.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén