"In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." –John 16:33

Category: Homeschool

Homeschool and why Stepan never asks “How are you doing?”

Day 106 of 1000 (214.1 lbs.)

I have talked previously spoken about my buddy Stepan from Russia here and here.  Stepan has a family to whom he is very devoted.  He is very interested in assuring his two little girls (ages 1 and 3) get the best education possible.  His oldest daughter started Suzuki violin at age one with a teacher who is serious.  The teacher told Stepan that her students should NOT play anything other that what they given so they would get in the habit of playing ONLY in the most correct way.  Stepan liked that.

The three year old started preschool earlier this year.  As is their wont, the teachers at the preschool had them do some fingerpainting.  Stepan was not happy.

He said, “The only thing they do there is have fun.  She already knows how to use a brush.  Fingerpainting is NOT art.”

He has begun to notice that schools in the United States, public and private, are not so good.  From the time Stepan was very young, he went to school to learn.  There was no fun or self-fulfillment about it.  He believes that life is a lot more fulfulling if you accomplish something.  The only way to accomplish things is to work hard and not necessarily have fun.  He believes the only way his daughters can get a good education here in America is through “home education.”  I concur with the bulk of that.

It reminded me of when I asked him “How are you doing?” one morning when he came into work.

He said, “We never say that in Russia.”

I asked, “Why not?”

He said, “Because, in Russia, it is usually bad.”

“Well, what do you say, then?” I asked.

“We wish people health.”

Lorena, Kelly, and Christian are running in the 8th Annual Krispy Kreme Challenge

8th Annual Krispy Kreme Run

Lorena, Kelly, and Christian are running in the very demanding 8th Annual Krispy Kreme Challenge.  I personally have decided not to run because it is so much more demanding to drive the car, eat the leftover donuts, and hold the coats.

Luke at Sonlight experiences homeschool disconnect in his class

Landmark History of the American PeopleLuke Holzman over at the Sonlight Blog wrote a post about how he learned less about history in his traditional school than he did in homeschool.  That experience resonates with us.  See here, here, and here.  He talked about the Sonlight Core D & E Curricula that includes the Landmark History of the American People books. He is right and this is part of the reason we have been such big fans of Sonlight. They are awesome books and give a feel for history I have not seen anywhere else. Now if they could just kick that horrible Joy Hakim history curriculum to the curb and find a worthy replacement.  It was less than useless for us.

The REAL state of public education in America

There is an article in The American Thinker (h.t. FreeRepublic) that explains just how bad government schools perform relative to their international peers.  A phenomena is described that is one of my pet peeves.  It seems like everyone in American suburbia believes the government school in their neighborhood is great because their kids get good grades.  Well, it turns out they DO get good grades if you compare them to other schools in America.  The problem is they are abject failures when compared to their international peers and even worse when compared to homeschoolers.  This is a great article.  I recommend it highly.

Continued conversation with the kid’s commie teacher

Day 81 of 1000

Christian and Kelly's commie teacherAs many already know, Kelly and Christian take a “writing” class at the community college where the dear leader of the class lectures on the evils of all things Christian, the beauty of communism and atheism, and the righteousness of drug legalization and abortion.  Today’s topic was Christianity.  He said he spoke about Christianity because we live in Raleigh.  He would have made his outrageous, silly arguments about Hindu if we lived in India.  Kelly read up a little over at the Wintery Knight blog to prepare and got a nice response after she tweeted Mr. Wintery Knight himself.

The “good” professor went on for about a half an hour about the evil’s of the organized church, for which the kids would have had a great deal sympathy if it were not for the his smuggness and arrogance.  Like all stories, that of the organized church has two sides.  He mentioned nothing about universities, hospitals, scientific method, the printing press, and all the other great foundings and inventions inspired by Christianity.

At the point when he made the claim that Adam and Eve could not have existed because of the scientific evidence for evolution, Christian raised his hand and said, “There is just as much scientific evidence against macroevolution as there is for it.”

“You don’t believe in evolution!” exclaimed the professor incredulously with a look of disdain and horror.

“We DO believe in microevolution.  It is grossly arrogant for you NOT to question your own beliefs when it comes to evolution” said Kelly.  “That is what you are demanding from us.”

The professor said, “Evolution is established scientific fact” and used several of the standard canards (fossil record, etc.) to establish his point.

Then they were off to the races.  Fortunately, during homeschool, Christian and Kelly had read books like The Victory of Reason:  How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success by Rodney Stark, Understanding Intelligent Design:  Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language by William Dembski and Sean McDowell, Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions by Greg Koukl, and Intellectuals by Paul Johnson.  The professor was armed with shibboleths about the truth of macroevolution and quotes from John Shelby Spong about the virgin birth.  John Shelby Spong!?!!  You have to be WILDLY out of touch with both current scholarship and reality if you quote John Shelby Spong about virtually anything.  He quotes the losers like Noam Chomsky and Bertrand Russell, too.

It is frustrating.  Here is a writing a professor who fervently believes he is making students question their beliefs through these profoundly silly arguments.  The subject matter is objectionable, but this guy’s incompetence is even more objectionable.  He does not appear to understand the difference between scientific method and historic method (very important in discussion of the resurrection).  Neither does he understand that it is impossible to argue for the primacy of scientific method without consideration of its philosophical underpinings.  I guess I should be grateful he is incompetent with respect to his arguments–he does nothing to get the kids to question their faith or worldview.  Still, a lot of taxpayer money is wasted on professors like this throughout the land.

Math and Engineering degrees are great even if you want to do something else

Day 80 of 1000

I found a great article in the Wall Street Journal this morning titled Generation Jobless:  Students Pick Easier Majors Despite Less Pay.  It had some startling statistics:

Workers who majored in psychology have median earnings that are $38,000 below those of computer engineering majors, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data by Georgetown University.

Wow.  The article tells a story about a student who switched from Electrical and Computer Engineering because her team stayed up past midnight in a lab to write a soda machine program.  They could not get it to work, so to keep from getting a bad grade, she withdrew from the course.  Then she switched from engineering to a double major in psychology and policy management.  Her grades went from B’s and C’s to A’s.  She said her high school did not prepare her for the rigor of an engineering degree.

So the upshot is that she is willing to work in a low-paying career for the rest of her life because she was unwilling to do what was necessary to pass a few hard classes.  I have had this discussion with people before.  If you cannot handle a specifc course, you can do a TON of things to make it happen. You can get a tutor.  You can take the class two or even three times if needed.  You can take a more remedial course, then try the tough one again.  Is it worth it to go to school for a year or two more to do something you like and that pays well for the next forty or fifty year?  It seems like a no brainer.

The crazy part is that even for those who want to do less technical jobs, it is best to prepare for that non-technical job with a hard degree.

Research has shown that graduating with these majors provides a good foundation not just for so-called STEM jobs, or those in the science, technology, engineering, and math fields, but a whole range of industries where earnings expectations are high. Business, finance and consulting firms, as well as most health-care professions, are keen to hire those who bring quantitative skills and can help them stay competitive.

We joked about this quite a bit, but I wanted to get it into the kids head that, if they went to college (not necessarily a given–preparation for many careers–pilot, electrician, writer, and small business owner are monumentally better served through some type of preparation other than college), they could study their passion, but they needed to start with a rigorous degree.  We defined rigorous as anything that involves hard math.  The use of hard math and statistics is creating new breakthroughs in a lot of fields right now:  medicine, agriculture, sociology, etc., etc. etc.

One of our pet peeves during our homeschool years was a couple of homeschool guys from Oregon who wrote a book titled Do Hard Things when they were in high school, then went off to a liberal arts college whose only majors are Government, Journalism, History, Literature, and Classical Liberal Arts.  Those are fine things to study, but are very far from the type of “hard” we are talking about here.  The only math I could find in their core curriculum was Euclidean Geometry.  If you want to get a book on doing hard things, forego the Harris book and get this one by Katie Davis has done at Azima.

Sonlight Homeschool Curricula (Part 1): Why we did not continue with Susan Wise Bauer’s The Well Trained Mind

This is the first in a series of articles about why we used Sonlight Curricula in our homeschool.  Here is a page that holds a description of the series and links to the other posts in the series.  We bought core packages for what would be third through tenth grades in a traditional school.  Kelly used the program from fifth through tenth grade.  Christian used the program from third through eighth grade.  This series mostly describes what we did for all the subject areas except math, music, and art.  I have already written pretty extensively on this blog about what we did for math and plan to do a future series on our art art program.  We bought most, but not all of our core materials from Sonlight and followed their curriculum guides with a fair amount of rigor.  Like most other homeschoolers, we deviated in minor ways where we saw fit.

[Previous post]
[Next post]

About half of the books you see in the mess in the picture below came from Sonlight.  We are very thankful we used their curriculum programs as a base for our homeschool for every year we homeschooled after the first grade.  Kelly started out at a neighborhood Christian kindergarten.  We started homeschool the year after that with programs we put together ourselves.   We used Explode the Code to teach Christian how to read when he was four.   I read a wonderful book titled, The Well-Trained Mind:  A Guide to Classical Education at Home by Susan Wise Bauer that formed the basis for Kelly’s first grade year.  Its precepts heavily influenced all our seven homeschool years.  I have two rubs against the book that pushed me toward prepackaged curricula:  1) The author seems to be supremely well equipped to talk about history, literature, and the social sciences, but very much less qualified to talk about math and the hard sciences.  2) The methods proposed in the book require an incredible amount of work with respect to material selection and daily study planning.  Nevertheless, that is what we did with Kelly in the first grade.  It worked superbly for us both in terms of the joy we derived from the day to day work and the academic results.


The Library Wing of Our Bonus Room – Homeschool Materials

All was well, but we decided to put the kids in government school when Christian was in kindergarten and Kelly was in the second grade.  The reason was that my job did not allow for sufficient time to prepare, let alone deliver according to the methods and materials Susan Wise Bauer so effectively described in her guide book.  The schools the kids attended in Sherwood, Oregon were really pretty good.  They stagnated a little academically, but made a few friends and enjoyed themselves very much.

We moved to Albany, Oregon at the beginning of Kelly’s fourth and Christian’s second grade years.  We are very thankful to the government schools in Albany because they shocked us out of our lethargy and motivated us to return our kids to homeschool.  The teachers, the teacher’s aides, the principal, the school lunches, and just about everything else about those schools was bad for our kids in just about every way.  Our experience suggests that government schools are a bad places to “socialize” children.  Our kid’s spirits got harder and more aggressive and their academics suffered greatly.  The teachers’ disinterest and aggressive worldview advocacy, an unsupportive principal, totally underqualified and surly teachers’ aides, and a plethora of other problems are a story for another day–I took extensive notes on all this while it happened and plan to write about it before too long.  I would be remiss in saying that our experience in the Albany government schools was all bad.  We know have a much more intimate understanding of the need for parents to take responsibility of their children’s education and not leave it to “professional” educators.  Also, there WAS a wonderful school secretary in one of the schools who we appreciated very, very much.

Well before the end of our Albany government school year, we decided we would homeschool the next year.  I had a great job, but worked about ten hours per day, so I only had three or four hours in the evening after dinner to work on the kids school.  Lorena was (is) a stay at home mom, so she could run the kids to music lessons, homeschool groups, swim lessons, art classes, and all those sorts of things.  She did not feel equipped to teach the homeschool.  She speaks beautiful English, but Spanish is her first language.  She kept the house, cooked for everyone, and usually attended community college three nights per week, so she had her hands full.  I agreed to act as the teacher.

I had the time an energy to do the day to day teaching in the evenings and weekly lesson plans on the weekends.  I love this stuff, but after my experience with Kelly’s first grade year, I knew I did not have enough time to follow The Well Trained Mind guide in the way that had worked so well for us previously.  I wanted to do that, but the time required to search for materials and create lesson plans left little one-on-one time with the kids.  That was the other thing.  The effort to teach Christian to read in preschool took only about twenty minutes per day for about three months, so I could spend a whole lot more time on teaching Kelly.  Now, I had two kids that required a couple of hours of one-on-one time plus an hour or so of planning each night and six to eight hours of preparation on the weekends if I were to do it properly, in the way that had worked so well with Kelly in the first grade.  I just did not have the time.

I looked at a lot of programs that summer before Christian’s third grade year and Kelly’s fifth grade year of school.  I will explain why we chose Sonlight rather than one of the others in the next installment.

Dad flies to North Carolina

I am sitting in the airport in Monterrey waiting for my flight to Atlanta.  I am going to try to put up some of the wedding pictures we took before I go.


Lorena and I

Katy y Estefania con Kelly

Luis y Priscila (los novios)

Rigo, Minita, y Luis Leonardo

Grandma Conchita, Kelly, Grandpa Lauro, y Lorena

Christian played mostly with Adrian (el guero)

Las muchas, primas de Kelly

Lili y Rigo

Ken y Lorena

El hijo de Tio Abel y su novia

Brandoncito y Tio Jorge

Lynncito y su primo

Primo Tomas, su esposa, Lorena, Conchita, Dayanita, y Tio Lauro

Los musicos

Grandma Conchita con sus nietos

Hectorin con los hijos de Johnny y Loela de Houston

Tia Dayana y Prima Dayanita

Tia Rosalinda y Primo Lynncito

Tia Rosalinda y Primo Lynncito

La familia con Prima Lili

Our family before the wedding

Homeschooling in Oregon

This is really happening:

Oregon government schools continue to fail while the state tries to further regulate successful homeschools

We just got notice that Oregon is going to try to further regulate the activities of homeschoolers.  There were a couple of events that created an interesting backdrop to the our receiving the email that describes the proposed legislation.  First, just a couple of weeks ago, an article came out in the local newspaper explaining that, after years of trying to make the questions easier on the state assessment tests in math, they had finally given up and want now to just lower the passing test scores so that more will pass.  Second, Lorena had a conversation with some people who are very, very involved in their local government school.  They have characterized the school as phenomenal.  The parents in the community arre said to be heavily involved in both academics and extracurricular activities.  The teachers are said to be engaged with and responsive to the needs of the students and the concerns of the parents.  The students are said to be receiving a stellar education–one of the best in the entire state.

So, I thought I would just take a look at their state report card.  For the school in question, the Federal Adequate Yearly Progress Rating was “NOT MET.”  In the last year reported, 45% of the students in the school could not read at grade level and 54% could not perform math at grade level.  This gave the school an Oregon Report Card Overall Rating of “Satisfactory.”  I was amazed.  Here is a school that the State of Oregon says is performing at a satisfactory level.  At least one set of parents in the school think there children are getting a phenomenal education there.  But by any object standard, the school is failing.  We started homeschooling because of the abysmal education our children were receiving at a school that was rated “exceptional” by the state.  The school had much higher reading and math scores.  I compared that to the test results for homeschoolers in that same area that are available on the Oregon Department of Education Home Schooling page.  Of course, for the entire population of students, 50% are at or below the 50 percentile.  For  the latest homeschool nationally normed, standardized test scores that I could find, the records showed that less than 20% of the tested students fell at or below the 50th percentile.  The homeschools, by every measure are doing better than the government schools.

All of the information is in the public domain so, if anyone wants to look at it, they can.  I got all of the information on websites run by either the school or the State of Oregon.  None of this even considers the wealth of studies that the quality of “socialization” in homeschool settings is better than in government school settings.  Here is a web page that describes and links to a small subset of that work.  In the meantime, while Rome burns and the legislature tries to further handcuff a group of citizen who provide a stellar education for their children, the big sports issue that really interests the education establishment in the state has risen to the Oregon Court of Appeals.

Homeschool methods update – Part 3 of 3 – college

This is the last in a short series of three posts we are doing for a friend who is starting to homeschool this year. We have no illusions about our homeschooling method and plans being right for anyone else, but we thought it might be a help for others to get a sense for what works for at least one family. The following is links to the first and second of the three posts:

Homeschool methods update – Part 1 of 3 – curricula
Homeschool methods update – Part 2 of 3 – a typical day

Of course, what students do after they finish high school varies greatly. Some get a job. Others join the military. Some take a year off and travel if they have the money. Some start a business. Many go on to college. Circumstances change, but to the extent that we have influence, we have decided that we want Kelly and Christian to be prepared to enter college. There is really no problem for well prepared homeschoolers to get into even the best universities in the nation. It is commonplace to read articles about homeschoolers succeeding at places like Stanford, Dartmouth, Harvard, and good small private colleges like Grove City, Hillsdale, and George Fox. There are homeschoolers in most state run colleges and universities, too. The third and fourth tier private colleges like Linfield, Lewis and Clark, and Willamette here in Oregon have programs to try to attract as many homeschooled students as they can get. So getting into a college is not really too difficult for students who document their academic achievements and test even at just an “OK” level on the SAT or ACT. We are doing ar best to cover those bases.

The challenge with many homeschoolers is that many of them are academically ready to enter college at a much younger age than normal. It is not so much that they are not ready for college, it is more that the college is not ready for them. If we stay on our current track, Kelly will be ready to start taking college courses in just three years and Christian will be ready in four. Of course, there is no way that we want them to leave home at that time. So we have to find a way to keep them academically engaged for two or three years at the college level while they are still at home.

The obvious answer for us is the community college. The government school district to which we pay our taxes is required to pay for community college for those students for which they have nothing to offer academically. Of course it could be argued that they have not ever had anything to offer, but that is a different post. We are fortunate to live within driving distance of both a community college and a major state university. It is not difficult to meet the admission requirements of the community college, so entrance to that system is easily manageable. We will probably start the kids at the there with they idea they will continue there through the age when they would normally have graduated from a government high school. That should help them prepare well for the PSAT, SAT, and/or ACT tests. Volunteer work, a job or two, and continued participation in their clubs, music, and sports should help to round out their preparation. It is up to Lorena and I to continue to document their academic progress. All this should prepare them to get into a good school.

If we prepare well, it will be easier for them to decide where (and if) they want to go to college. We are kind of hoping they will stay at home through a bachelor’s degree and then take a graduate degree as their away from home experience, but that will really be their decision. If things move along on their current course, both of the kids should graduate with a bachelor’s degree by the time they are nineteen or twenty. The other wild-card, is that, if we have the resources, we would like to go someplace for six or nine months to pick up a third language. Whether we can do that and whether the time we take will impact the schooling is something we do not know. Neither do we know whether it will work out like this at all. But we have a plan that we can either follow or modify as time and chance change our circumstances. Even if it does not all go according to plan, it is good to have a plan.

Homeschool methods update – Part 2 of 3 – a typical day

This is the second in a short series of three posts we are doing for a friend who is starting to homeschool this year. We have no illusions about our homeschooling method and plans being right for anyone else, but we thought it might be a help for others to get a sense for what works for at least one family. The following is links to the first and third of the three posts:

Homeschool methods update – Part 1 of 3 – curricula
Homeschool methods update – Part 3 of 3 – college

Today I am going to try to describe a typical day of homeschool in the Chapman household. This is material about which I have previously written, but due to an email we received from some of our friends in Australia who are just getting started homeschooling I thought it might be nice to explain how we go about it. We make no claims about our homeschool methods other than that they work for us. Most days are not typical homeschool days because every day of the week is occupied with, not only the academic subjects we cover, but all the extracurricular activities in which the children participate. I will try to capture all of that, too. This will divided into two categories. First, there is a the kids study schedule. Second, I explain what I do to prepare, teach, and correct.

Schedule

  • 5:50 – Dad goes to work
  • 7:00 – Get up, make their beds, get dressed, read their bibles, and memorize their bible verses
  • 8:00 – Christian practices guitar, Kelly practices Piano
  • 8:45 – Breakfast
  • 9:15 – Clean up (floss, brush, wash face, etc.)
  • 9:30 – Morning academic subjects: Math, grammar, history, literature, vocabulary
  • 12:00 – Lunch
  • 12:30 – Afternoon academic subjects: Writing, Spanish, science
  • 2:30 – Break for a snack
  • 2:45 – More literature, history, catch-up, and corrections
  • 3:30 – Go out and play until Dad gets home.
  • 4:30 – Dad comes home and calls his partner, Ron at Quality Corners
  • 5:30 – Dad starts corrections
  • 6:00 – Kids come in and start on corrections and work with Dad on new materials
  • 6:30 – Dinner
  • 7:00 – Spelling and continued work on corrections and new materials
  • 7:30 – Kelly and Christian read aloud to Dad and work on a jigsaw puzzle while he does his exercises
  • 8:15 – Goof off until bedtime at 9:00

We are playing to do one or two days per week of drawing, painting, or pottery starting in the next week or so in addition to the following extracurricular activities:

Monday – Kelly baby sits a group of small kids with a girl from Santiam Christian School
Tuesday – Tennis and Kelly’s Piano (we are deciding on what to do about Boy Scouts on Tuesday nights)
Thursday – Tennis and Christian’s Guitar

Preparation

Each week I prepare a one page schedule for each day of the week for each of the kids. We stick very close to the schedule recommended by our Sonlight curricula provider for Science, History and Literature. We go a little faster than many on the mathematics because the kids can handle it and the Teaching Textbooks lends itself to one lesson per day. The same is true for the Wordly Wise vocabulary program and the Easy Grammar and Easy Writing programs. They spend twenty minutes per day on Rosetta Stone Spanish. Christian spends 30 minutes per day on his elective material which is C# programming while Kelly spends that much time or more writing and illustrating stories that we are going to put into a book at the end of the year.

The schedules are setup so the kids know what they are supposed to do before breakfast, before lunch, after lunch, and when I get home. It is setup as a checklist that gives them enough flexibility to make some decisions on their own about when they will do each element of the program, but structured enough so they can know whether they are ahead or behind at any given point in the day.

It usually takes me a couple of hours on Saturday morning to put a weeks schedule together and I usually have two weeks of schedule ahead of the kids when they start on a Monday morning. I keep each schedule in one large spreadsheet in OpenOffice.org. We print out five pages (one per day) per kid per week that they keep in a large, zip-up loose leaf binder. If I have to make adjustments during the week I can just pencil them in. When they finish any materials, they put their work into the binder behind the schedule for the day on which they are working so I can easily get to it for correction. They also put a red sticky note in any books where they have performed work so I can find them easily. When I correct, I put a sticky note of another color into the places where the corrections are required.

Testing

In addition to the normal, end of chapter tests we give in Math and Science, the kids take a nationally normed standardize test each year to see where they are relative to government, private, and homeschool students throughout the country. This year they will take the test in early April. This testing takes two or three days and is much more comprehensive and rigorous than the testing performed on the Oregon government school students. The State of Oregon is currently going through another effort to further lower the score required to pass and/or rigor of their tests. Kelly and Christian will be taking the Stanford Achievement Test which will be administered by one of the local private schools.

Next: Our plans to prepare the kids for college

Homeschool methods update – Part 1 of 3 – curricula

We have some friends living down in Australia who started homeschooling this year. They asked us to explain a little big about how we go about it. I have not written about how we go about for quite awhile, so I thought I would explain a little bit about our curriculum and methods. Today I will discuss our curricula with a follow-up post in a day or so about what a typical day is like for us and a final post on how we plan to prepare the kids for college and how we test them to make sure they are getting what they need academically.

Homeschool methods update – Part 2 of 3 – a typical day
Homeschool methods update – Part 3 of 3 – college

The core of our curricula is from Sonlight. We believe their forte is their history and literature programs. This year, Christian is doing a one year survey of non-Western cultures. Christian’s program includes twenty some novels that are mostly Newbery and Caldecott Award winning books centered around the culture and time about which Christian is studying. Kelly is finishing her second year of a two year survey of world history, starting from the dawning of time and finishing in the 1990’s. Her program includes the same kind of high quality novels as those Christian is reading, but that cover the eras, places, and people she studies. Examples of the history books that she reads include Caesar’s World, George Washington’s World, and Abraham Lincoln’s World all by Genevieve Foster and Susan Rice Bauer‘s The Story of the World collection who is also the author of The Well-Trained Mind: A Guide to Classical Education at Home. The thing that comes with the program that we avoid is their religious materials. The reality is that some of it is not that bad, but our aversion to organized religion, a paid ministry, and church buildings make some of them a little hard to take, so we just avoid them.

We also use the Sonlight Science programs because they are very well done. We have a great little addition to the science that is kind of funny, kind of fun, and very educational. It is series of books from company called Lyrical Learning. The kids are currently in Lyrical Life Science Volume. The sing songs about science topics and it really helps them remember some very complicated materials. And they have fun doing it.

Sonlight provides a variety of math options. Both Kelly and Christian did their elementary school math in Singapore Math. It is a program put out by the Singapore Ministry of Education. Singapore has the best elementary school math students in the world. We understand why that is true after having used the materials. Now, though, Christian has moved on to Teaching Textbooks Prealgebra and Kelly has gone on to Teaching Textbooks Algebra I. These are awesome math programs specifically tailored for the homeschool student. The program they provide is very systematic, easy to understand, and full of feedback, both for the parents and the students. Lorena is taking a calculus class at the University right now as she works toward her degree so we are all pretty well saturated in math for the moment.

For grammar we use the Easy Grammar series. Kelly has just moved from grammar into Easy Writing. We love these books. They are super for allowing the kids to learn the material on their own and get a solid foundation in English grammar. We use the Wordly Wise Series for vocabulary. The books are irritatingly politically correct and just flat wrong in some of the essays they use to get the kids to understand and use the words, but the vocabulary work is excellent. We do lots of things for writing. The kids write annual research reports, a quarterly magazine to send out to friends and family — the February issue will be the first one where some of our homeschool friends in Texas will be writing an article (and it is a good one). They do some daily writing work out of the Wordsmith series, but now that the kids are a little older, we are probably going to move on to the WriteShop series. We also give them assigned letters once per week or so and a current events paragraph from World Magazine every Friday. The kids are both fluent in Spanish because we speak it at home as our first language. We have them both working on in Rosetta Stone Spanish to get a better academic understanding of the language. We plan to move on to French in a couple of years.

On the side, both Kelly and Christian have hobbies. Kelly writes constantly. She is writing and illustrating a series of short stories right now. Christian has learned to write C# programs and loves to do claymation and 3D animations using the Blender program on the computer. He is also a Boy Scout. We do a LOT of reading aloud together and, in during the summer, spend a half an hour each evening listening to classical music and going through a drawing program.

Swimming has been the bulk of our physical education effort up until now. Kelly and Christian are both good swimmers now, so we will be transitioning them into tennis for awhile. Kelly is in her seventh year of piano. She performed in a Bach Festival yesterday and performs regularly at recitals. Christian took three years of piano lessons and then switched over to guitar. With a fellowship meeting and two gospel meetings per week, and playing with the neighborhood kids it is pretty hard to stay caught up with everything.

That is not all we do for homeschool, but it is the bulk of the academic stuff. We take an annual trip to downhill ski with another homeschool family once a year, we communicate in various ways with professing homeschool families in Texas, Arizona, California, and Arkansas. We visit museums, etc., etc. One thing we know is that we will never go back to what the government is providing. We are not against the government schools, but it is very difficult to understand how any of those kids ever get socialized, what with spending their time in a room with one or two teachers and thirty or so students of the exact same age as themselves. They never get a chance to get out and meet anyone or learn to function socially with anyone other than an isolated group of peers who do not have the benefit of having experienced anything else. It is like Lord of the Flies.

Homeschool (false) pride

Homeschool day 61 of 180
Government school day 50 of 170

We homeschool because we love to see our children learn those things we value. We pulled them out of government school because they were taught values we did not hold. Among those values we abhor is the idea that a child should have high self esteem regardless of whether he possesses qualities that warrant such esteem. That concept was promoted with religious fervor at the school our children attended. Pride in wrong things is an insidious evil. There is a problem amongst many of us in the homeschool community that is similar in nature to the self esteem problem endemic in the American government school systems.

This is our fourth year of homeschool, our third in a row. When we pulled our children out of the local government school, we felt like we had just quit hammering ourselves on the foot. The pain of government school soon started to ebb. Our children started learning to be nice again. They were learning their academic material with joy and at a fast pace. Of course, we worried about that old canard that homeschool students are not as well “socialized” as their government school counterparts, so we got involved with a local homeschool group. There were some very nice people in the group.

It was a fairly typical homeschool group. The parents were well educated and fairly religious. They wanted the best for their children, so they decided to homeschool them. They met up with other families of like mind to start play groups, drama clubs, sports teams, choirs, shared classes, and those sorts of things. These are not bad things, but we saw a dynamic we did not understand very well at first. I suppose this dynamic is similar in nature to that of other early adopters of new (or newly reacquired) social constructs. Dramatic improvements are realized in the lives of the people who embrace the new idea. The new social construct takes on a life of its own and becomes an end onto itself. Homeschool becomes the greater good, replacing improved education, values, and socialization for the children. The homeschool parents take great pride in their own works. The accomplishments of the children are the manifestation of the great good being wrought on them by the way the parents implement their homeschool.

Now, when the children fail to perform at the desired level, the parent’s pride takes a personal hit. The performance of the children is a direct reflection on the accomplishment of the parent in their implementation of the new idea. The children learn that performance is everything. If the children do not perform, the pride of the parent takes a hit. It reminds me of stories about getting toddlers into the right preschool so they can get into the right kindergarten so they can get into the right elementary school, all the way up to the right MBA program all for the pride of the parent. If the children do not get into the right school, the parent has failed. There is an equivalent to phenomenon in the homeschool community. The pride of the parent becomes more important than the well-being of the child.

This becomes particularly sad when the parents become so involved with the homeschool community that the children’s sense of security begins to suffer. Cliques form. The parent must stay very involved in the homeschool community so their child will have the lead role in the play, the right solo in the choir, the right position on the basketball team. In some senses, it can be even worse than in the government school system. At least in the government school system, someone else can be blamed if a child does not get the right role in the play. For those homeschool parents who have bought into the idea that homeschool is an end onto itself, there is nowhere else to place the blame other than on themselves. The situation can get quite desperate.

This pride can feed on itself in these groups. There is a dynamic that manifests itself in discussions within the groups that feature the thought that “God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are…” The homeschool groups can become an intemperate revelry of self-congratulations. Great pride is taken in the effort of the homeschool parent to give something better to their children than they are getting in other academic environments. Joy in the children decreases as pride in the effort of the parent increases.

The answer, of course, is the realization that homeschool is no more the answer to the well-being of the child than government or private school. Investment in the process can easily get in the way of the well-being of the child in either environment. There is not a whole lot of difference between the homeroom parent at a public school who is so involved in helping the school that they ignore their children and the homeschool parent so involved in the process and implementation of their system that they too ignore their children. They take so much pride in their own efforts that the needs of the children become secondary.

Humility and unselfish love are the only antidotes. I know my hands are not clean in this either; note the first two lines in italics at the top of this post.

What to say about homeschool: Part 3 – The socialization advantage

Socialization

Wayne the Mexican July 25, 2006 Socialization

Note: This is by no means intended to be an exhaustive look at this subject matter. Rather, it is a description of why we found homeschool to be a compelling alternative for our children when we considered the issue of socialization. The linked resources are a minor, but relevant subset of the available information on measures of socialization in different school settings.

A helpful first step when discussing the subject of socialization for children is to identify some underlying assumptions. Inherent to the question of socialization is the context within which the socialization takes place. That is, which society is the society to which a child should be socialized? The answer to that question is beyond the scope of this discussion. Nevertheless, it is often possible to find common ground about what qualities are important for positive socialization even though the question of which society is the right society for which to prepare a child remains unresolved. Some of these qualities might include things like personal responsibility, civic involvement, kindness, a strong work ethic, or any number of other qualities. The important question then becomes, “What are some valid measures of socialization?”

Research

Researchers have, indeed, identified some such measures and then made an effort to take measurements. The work of measuring socialization levels amonst homeschoolers is just beginning. The Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) commissioned a survey of adults who were home educated. Of the over 7300 people surveyed, over 5000 had been homeschooled at least seven years. Some of the results of the study can be found here. I highly recommend anyone considering homeschool to take a look at the results of this survey. Dr. Brian Ray of the National Home Education Research Institute (NHERI) conducted the survey. There is a good body of additional research available at the NHERI website. The survey compared the sample population of homeschoolers to the general U.S. population on a variety of measures of socialization. The numbers for the homeschool students are taken from the survey while sources are cited for the numbers used for comparison for the general U.S. population. There are comparison data for several items in each of the following categories:

  • Educational attainment for those in the survey between age 18 and 24
  • Involvement in community
  • Civic involvement
  • A measure called the “Happiness quotient”

In addition, there is a compilation of the current occupation of the sample population. On every one of the measured items, the homeschool prepared students scored significantly higher than those in the general U.S. population. It should be noted that the survey was commissioned by a homeschool advocacy group.

I found several small studies that probably were not large enough to give a sense for homeschooling in general, but still ring true to what we have experienced in our own homeschool and the homeschools in our community. One such study titled Socialization Skills in Home Schooled Children Versus Conventionally Schooled Children by Koehler, et. al. showed that the homeschool students that were tested scored above average in four out of five categories of socialization while conventionally schooled students that were tested scored average in all the categories. This study included only 23 total students, but includes a good bibliography that can be consulted for further information.

Personal experiences

Bad socialization influences in the public school system where we live was one of the main reasons we decided to start homeschooling. We had a very positive experience in the public school system before we moved to the area of the state where we live now. After a series of experiences at the new school with the administration and teaching staff over a period of a year, we studied the issue and decided to change to homeschooling. I think our experience is not very different from that of others who have decided to homeschool. There are often specific circumstances that lead to the decision to leave the public school system. There is a brilliant article that I found while reading the Wittingshire blog that speaks directly to that subject of how the public school system and culture create such circumstances. No Thank You, We Don’t Believe in Socialization! is authored by Lisa Russell.

Conclusion

There needs to be more research in this area to determine how different homeschool groups and styles fare in terms of socialization when compared against those in conventional public and private school environments. I think a clearer picture will emerge when more data are available. So far though, according to the research I have seen and our own experience, children can benefit greatly not only from the socializing influences that are unique to homeschooling, but also from avoiding those experiences commonly occuring in the public school system.

Next: Academic performance

Socialization in public school

I am currently working on a post about socialization in a series of posts about why we have chosen to homeschool our children. There is a great article titled How the Schools Shortchange Our Boys by Gerry Garibaldi in City Journal that does a great job of describing some of our concerns in that regard. I will be posting my article on this topic in the next week or so.

H.T. Powerline

What to say about homeschool: Part 2 – The very small class size advantage

Class Size

Wayne the Mexican - July 20, 2006

Note: This is by no means intended to be an exhaustive look at this subject matter. Rather, it is a description of why we found homeschool to be a compelling alternative for our children when we considered the class size issue. The linked resources are a minor, but relevant subset of the available information on how class size influences student performance.

It seems intuitively obvious that as the size of a class gets smaller, a teacher can grant more individual attention to each student. That is true, but in a way that really surprised me. From what I have been able to garner, the correlation between small class size and performance does not really start to improve until class size has dropped to fifteen or fewer students. When the class size drops to that level, the teacher has sufficient time for one-on-one tutoring to improve the performance of the class as a whole. If the class size is larger than fifteen, there is appears to be no such effect.

One-on-one tutoring has been shown in some studies to have a significant effect on performance while very small group tutoring has a less significant effect. This is one such study. This paper describes the effect of smaller class size on improving performance, not only because of smaller group instruction tailored to the needs of small sub-groups, but because of one-on-one individualized instruction and the reduction of disciplinary problems due to the closer relationship the teacher has time to develop with the individual students. These are exactly the type of benefits you would expect to see in a class of four or fewer homeschool students.

One of the largest and most important studies on whether performance can be improved by class size reduction was a four year longitudinal study performed in Tennesse called Project STAR. There is a good deal of controversy about how the report was interpreted. Some say it shows that smaller class sizes improve performance, but others who have looked at the same data argue it shows just the opposite. The bigger point, though, is that the smallest class sizes for which data were reported were classes with between thirteen and seventeen students. That is right at the boundary where we expect the teacher to start having enough time to provide sufficient one-on-one tutoring to cause statistically significant improvements in standardized test scores for the whole class. Here are some additional links to studies and surveys that describe the correlation between small class size and academic performance:

Conclusion: The abilities of the teacher to provide one-on-one tutoring and to get to know and understand the needs of the individual students appear to be the greatest contributors to improved student performance when class size is considered. Most homeschools have less than five students which provides for a level of one-on-one tutoring rarely available in public or even private school settings. Parents as teachers can know and understand the needs of their children better than teachers in typical public school settings. We view these small class size advantages as very compelling reasons to homeschool our children.

Next: Socialization

What to say to people who rail against your newly made decision to homeschool: Part 1

The biggest obstacles we faced when we decided to homeschool our children were doubts sowed by trusted friends and relatives. Never having homeschooled nor read the plethora of scholarly literature on the subject, some still expressed strong opinions about the inefficacy of homeschooling, the damage wrought by removing children from the socializing influence of the public school system, and the difficulty of maintaining the level of discipline and interest to do it well. Those of us who have been homeschooling a couple of years and have enjoyed it, often forget the strength of those negative influences in our own beginnings. I plan to write about our own experiences and information gathered from several scholarly studies that helped us overcome those influences to get started and continue in our homeschooling efforts.

These posts will be written for people who are just getting started in homeschooling. To those who have been doing it for awhile, the reasons are readily apparent. I am more comfortable in dealing with most objections about homeschooling than when we started a couple of years ago. People who are around our children know that, while they are not perfect, they are much better off educationally and socially than while they were in the public school system. I think that is the reason we seem to get many fewer objections than when we were just starting. We still get occasional disparaging remarks. It works best for us just not to respond.

There are a good number of scholarly studies of things like socialization, performance on standardized tests, and other criteria by which children can be measured in different academic settings. Many of these measures can be helpful when deciding whether or not to homeschool. For example, there is a lot that is known about the influence of class size on student performance. It is not what many people believe it to be, but it is pretty cut and dried with a variety of studies that do a pretty good job of measuring the correlations. A typical homeschool has four or fewer students. Does such a class perform better than classes of fifteen, twenty, thirty, or forty? Does the level of education of a public school teacher matter when it comes to the performance of their students? How about homeschool teachers? There are answers to these and other similar questions based on studies using solid scientific methods.

While these studies were not the only, nor even the primary reason why we choose to homeschool, they helped us make a reasoned decision about getting started and give us confidence that we can continue to make it work for us and our children.

Busy, but I got some pictures

The reason I really didn’t get anything done last night was because I had to go pick up a machine from Steve Davison to send over to Quality Corners in Idaho yesterday. A picture of the machine and Steve is at the bottom of this post. The pictures below are recent ones of Kelly and Christian.


Kelly Studying


Christian


Kelly reading


Steve and the new routing machine for Quality Corners

Didn’t get much done yesterday on our homeschool program, but I got some pictures of the kids and the machine Steve Davison built for us that I had to pick up last night.

Page 5 of 5

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén