"In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." –John 16:33

Tag: government school

Scott McNealy, Curriki and why public education is such a failure in America

Scott McNealy is one of the co-founders of Sun Microsystems and a big proponent of something called open source education. I am on board with what he says. His public education philosophy tracks closely with mine. He explains the whole concept of open source education materials and what he has done about it here:

Here is a link to the Curriki, the free K-12 curricula and resource website he describes in the video.

What brought this back to my radar was a link my friend Andrew sent me to an online video interview of McNealy. He said, “Discussion of education starts around 28:50.  Right at 31:55, he says a few words that I thought would really ring true for you.” Boy howdy was he right. I transcribed just a little bit of it here to give you the flavor McNealy’s remarks on education, part of which is about his ideas on education. I could not embed the video, but you can get to it by clicking here. I might note that he starts talking about education well before 28:50 and that is certainly worth a listen, too.

Interviewer: What is the state of the art right now? What’s going on in classes these days?

Scott McNealy: Monopoly is the wart.

Interviewer: In this case, the teachers union monopoly?

Scott McNealy: Who is the biggest monopolist out there? The government. So now we have the government sector union teachers driving the architecture, the process, all the rest of it. Meanwhile technology is going up, up and away.

There is much more in the video. McNealy talks about the concept of going to school, not to live one’s dream, but to get a job. The thing I really like about McNealy is that he put his money where his mouth was and did something about the whole educational mess in America. Our little family did it on a micro level by pulling our kids out of the traditional/government school morass while McNealy did it on an über-macro level and set up a system whereby every kid in America and around the world can benefit. Kudos to him!

Justifying government school for all the wrong reasons

Here is an article by a woman who tries to justify her decision not to homeschool her kids. All of us homeschoolers have had to put up with the demands of ignorant meddlers who want to know how we can justify not putting our kids into traditional school. It is kind of nice that a few people are starting to get that it is traditional (and especially government) school that needs justification. Still this woman really demonstrated she has not given homeschool a fair shake nor even any depth of thought when she said:

What we’re doing here is hard. Most conservative parents want to raise kids who can live in the world without being fully assimilated to it. This is a daunting project, and there are many ways to go wrong. You can overprotect your kids. You can underprotect your kids. Some parents blight their children’s futures by monitoring them too closely, never allowing them to develop the emotional maturity needed to cope with disappointment and failure. Other parents will look back in 20 years and wonder, “Why didn’t I intervene before that problem became serious?”

Homeschooling is becoming more popular because it gives parents more control over the various stages of their children’s development. That’s readily understandable, but homeschooling can’t be a magic bullet, because kids do eventually need to learn how to navigate an unsympathetic world where most people do not love them. This is the grain of truth in the often-lazy “socialization” argument against homeschooling, and parents who reply “I wish to socialize my children myself” are missing the point. Your kids cannot spend their whole lives in the bosom of their natal family.

The socialization, overprotection, “need to learn hot to navigate an unsympathetic world” memes display profound ignorance of how most homeschools actually work. No thoughtful homeschool program leaves kids to “spend their whole lives in the bosom of their natal family,” nor is that an aim of any homeschool parents of my acquaintance. Actually, it is the traditional school students who wallow in the bosom of teachers inculcated with hard left political correctness by the mind numbing deweyite teacher education programs that are the order of the day.

So, while we are quite pleased that you feel the need to justify the dumping of your kids into these cesspools of progressivism, your justification and arguments are not well served by holding up straw men.

Betty Blonde #409 – 02/09/2010
Betty Blonde #409
Click here or on the image to see full size strip.

Making the point about our government schools

Lorena texted me this a couple of minutes ago after reading my previous blog post. It is a video that is quite illustrative of a point or two I was trying to make.

Government school teacher decides what is morally best for other people’s kids

This article in the Christian Post tells the story of a homosexual teacher of third graders who chose to resign after he colluded with the school’s Assistant Principal to read a book that promoted homosexual marriage to his students behind the backs of the student’s parents. The headline of the article outrageously lays the responsibility for the resignation of the teacher and the Assistant Principal on the parents. A paragraph in the middle of the article explains the real reason they resigned.

Due to the outrage among the parents, Currie and Goodhand felt compelled to issue their resignations last week. And Currie said he felt he could no longer teach at a school located in the socially conservative church community of Efland.

“I’m resigning because when me and my partner sat down and talked about it we felt I wasn’t going to have the support I needed to move forward at Efland,” Currie added. “It’s very disappointing.”

Bad grammar and all, this statement is at complete odds with the title of the article. It was the self-serving feelings of the teacher and the Assistant Principal that caused them to resign, not the justifiable outrage of the parents. The egregious act of indoctrination of young children to accept one side of an extremely controversial topic without first checking with the parents is bad. The arrogance of this government school teacher’s justification for perpetrating this outrage is even more staggering. He said:

I think that anyone who knows me as a teacher would understand that that is an absurd claim,” Currie said. “Every single decision is based on what is best for my kids, not what is best for Omar Currie. I am a champion for my kids. I fight tooth and nail for every single thing that my kids need.

He is so wrong on so many counts. They are not his kids. What is best for the kids in his class, especially when it comes to controversial moral and sexual issues, is not his decision. I am not sure about this government school teacher, but government schools in general have a horrible record relative to the teaching of reading, writing and arithmetic. They should get their house in order on those subjects and leave the moral and sexual instruction to the parents.

This guy is a product of the horrible education provided to education majors by the teacher education establishment within the university system in this country. Until we clean that house by recruiting higher quality students, getting rid of the rampant political correctness there and dramatically increasing the academic rigor of teacher education programs, we are going to have to deal with this kind of thing. The better option is to just not participate with the government schools by opting for homeschool or private school or, better yet, get the government completely out of the delivery of education. Milton Friedman had the right idea on all this.

Betty Blonde #355 – 11/25/2009
Betty Blonde #355
Click here or on the image to see full size strip.

Let the teachers use tried, tested, highly successful methods to teach math (and other important stuff)

Trisha's teaching awardI talk with my cousin and favorite government school teacher, Trisha, regularly on the subject of pedagogy and traditional school politics. There is always drama and it is always interesting. Her current school leadership makes her situation way more interesting than it should be. It sounds like the school board is on top of it and is in the process of fixing some pretty serious stuff, but it takes way longer than it should and the kids and classroom teachers are the ones who suffer. Much emotional and bureaucratic effort is unnecessarily wasted on this drama that takes time from the teaching of the kids.

At any rate, Trisha got a highly deserved teaching award the other day (see the cool picture of the apple trophy). Her students regularly outperform their peers on standardized tests. Part of this is a result of Trisha’s hard work to find appropriate methods for each particular student and situation. She really knows how to teach the kids. Her biggest challenge in doing her job is the demands placed on her by government regulation, school management and by disruptive students in the classroom. It is interesting that the school board appears to be very much on her side, but through no fault of their own–again because of government restrictions–have to move at a glacial pace to fix bad stuff.

This was all in my mind when I read about a letter to the editor written by a parent in Seattle that was linked on the Sonlight blog. The author of the letter really nailed it with something that, in our experience, is very true. Schools have successfully taught math in some parts of the world for many years. The idea is to find the methods that work so well in these places and use them. That is precisely what we tried to do in our homeschool with some level of success, especially in Math. Here is the well stated salient point from the letter:

Math has been taught to children at least since ancient Greece, Rome and Egypt, and those kids grew up to use their mathematical skills to build the Parthenon, aqueducts and pyramids, which are still standing. The math taught in K-12 hasn’t really changed much since Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac Newton invented calculus in the 1600s, so one would think that educators have had enough time to figure out how to teach it.

How about if educators stop experimenting with our kids, adopt whatever approach the Finnish or Singapore schools use, and get on with it?

Betty Blonde #317 – 10/02/2009
Betty Blonde #317
Click 
here or on the image to see full size strip.

Socialization, teaching and large groups of children

Luke, in his latest post at the Sonlight blog, writes about a conversation he had with a friend who appears to work at a traditional school. The whole post is great with one minor caveat which I will discuss in a bit. Here is a bit that nails the whole government school socialization conundrum:

“This one school has an assembly every Thursday morning.” He looks at me, inviting me to ask.

“What do they talk about every week?”

He produces a gorilla shrug. “Exactly!” He’s as excited now as he was when talking about the affection his kids have for him. “I have no idea! In fact, in a school that large, it takes a ton of time just to file all the kids in and out. It’s an hour of that, every week, for 36 weeks, for every single student. File in. File out. And when you have a mass of kids like that…” he pauses. “Large groups of children do not tend to propagate maturity.”

The post describes concepts that are easy to understand, but that many are willfully unwilling, if you will, to acknowledge.

The only part of the post with which I have a quibble is the quote from Neil deGrasse Tyson that advocates for the idea that schools should teach empathy along with reading, writing and arithmetic. As is usually the case with Tyson, he has made what, on the surface, appears to be an enlightened statement, but that is monumentally wrong. The last people who should be assigned to teach children empathy in the current government school educational environment are teachers. It is not that some teachers might not be be great at it–it is that the system ties the teachers’ hands and often advocates for the teaching, even bullying of students with Christian world views on things like homosexuality, sex and origins. Too often, the empathy only travels one direction. Maybe we should change the system and/or let the parents manage how their children get taught empathy.

Luke — Thanks for another great post. Please forgive the quibble!

Betty Blonde #263 – 07/22/2009
Betty Blonde #263
Click 
here or on the image to see full size strip.

There ARE some great government school teachers

I have a cousin who is a government school teacher in Nevada. She is very, very good at her job as is attested by the scores of her students on national normed standardized tests both in terms of the scores themselves and the improvement from previous years. We regularly talk about a lot of things on the phone, but every conversation eventually makes its way around to education. The best of both homeschoolers and and traditional schoolers is that they maintain focus on education. I certainly believe that our country is in big trouble because of the state of our public school system.

That being said, I think the problem is bigger than the education system. The reason the education system is in trouble is that our culture as a whole is in trouble. The reason the schools are failing is because the students, teachers, parents and administrators are all a product of a culture on the move toward secular humanism and paganism, even in the church. Still, there are people out there fighting the good fight to educate our children. We should cherish them. They have to deal with things in the classroom that are way outside the venue of teaching.

My cousin in Nevada has a great blog called Roll Call Tales. If you want to read a great blog by a teacher who is giving it her all down in the trenches, this is a great one. She blasted out a rant there yesterday titled Pray for Teachers that is well worth reading. You should read the whole thing, but here is an excerpt.

Pray for teachers. Please. In one corner we are talking to the child whose mother may have ended her life with pills when she was three and she “doesn’t even know what she liked.” In another corner we are working with a student who has every excuse in the world to not do a thing and a parent that backs him up. Then he wants the grade adjusted because effort doesn’t always equal ability. The bully that is learning to bully from home? It has to be from home right? The quiet one in the corner that you have to beg to speak. The English-Language learner that looks at you in panic every time you call on them. Please don’t call on them. The student that is obsessed with food. The student isn’t malnourished and you can’t figure it out. Until you find out the cupboards are locked at home and food is taken out of their hands and eaten by the parents. The student that cries whenever the teacher has to leave because being left in the classroom with the “scary” sub just fills them with anxiety and they can’t even think. The student whose eyes fill with panic when you say the word “test” or “writing” and you have to find a way to reassure them they can do this. Just getting words on a page that make “sense” is the most amazing accomplishment. The students whose eyes sometime sparkle and sometimes look so flat and dead and not there, You are chilled wondering what put that look there.

She wins some and she losses some, but she keeps on fighting the fight. It is worth it.

Homeschool is not a monolithic thing

Yesterday, Matt Walsh reposted an article he had written on homeschool at The Blaze. He is very supportive of homeschool, but both the article and the usual acrimonious arguments following the article were pretty depressing. The arguments for and against both homeschool and government school followed the standard pattern. They included the socialization canard, arguments about homeschool versus government school academic performance, anecdotes about über homeschoolers who graduated from college years early and reclusive, uncivilized homeschool acquaintances incapable of functioning in society.

I have been in those kinds of discussions about homeschool. All homeschoolers have engaged in them. They always depress me. There are as many different kinds of homeschool styles as there are homeschool children. When someone argues about the relative merits of homeschool over other methods of schooling, I immediately want to know what kind of homeschool they have in mind when they are arguing. Our homeschool was very academically oriented with a focus on math, science and history. If the measure of a homeschool is academic performance in those areas, than we would probably be judged as having done pretty well.

Some homeschools are more oriented toward the arts or vocational training or any number of other foci. If judged with respect to those areas, we probably would not fare so well. We worked hard at music, art, literature and athletics. I would like to think we did an adequate job in those areas–probably pretty average. We did not work so hard on auto repair, welding, plumbing, construction and sewing. I know some homeschool kids who learned how to do those things extremely well and are gainfully employed as tradesmen who contribute greatly to society, but our kids were probably below average in those areas.

I also know personally of failed homeschools. The kids truly are unsocialized messes. Of course, we all know people in all of the categories I have described from government school, especially the unsocialized messes. I have decided I no longer want to engage in arguments about the kinds of homeschools about which I know very little. I know there are plenty of studies out there that purport to measure how well homeschools do in the areas of socialization and academics. I have bought into those studies in the past, but when I consider what I know about homeschool, I realize that I really only have in-depth knowledge about what we did in our homeschool. I know that worked for us way better than the government schools our kids attended for a couple of years, but that is all I know. I do not know whether what we did would work for anyone else.

On the other hand, I have seen the research that shows the government schools, as a whole, are an abysmal failure. There are very good alternatives, but there is no universal right answer on what is best for any given child.  I do believe the one best suited to choose between the available good alternatives is almost always a caring parent. It should never be the government or a government worker who makes the decision except in extreme cases of abuse. Certainly the “professional educator” class (government school teachers and administrators) should not be involved in any of these kinds of decisions. As a whole, they seem to know less than anyone what is in the best educational interest of most children. There might be some cases where government school is best, but the parent should get to decide and I am not willing to second guess them.

Betty Blonde #190 – 04/08/2009
Betty Blonde #190
Click 
here or on the image to see full size strip.

Not college material?

Day 882 of 1000

I am a big fan of Matt Walsh and an even bigger fan of the idea that not everyone should go to college.  That being said, this blog post that explains why Matt did not go to college seems very wrong-headed in one of its premises.  It is an excellent post worthy of a read.  I am in complete agreement with him on his decision not to go to college.  I have described my belief that many very capable people would be much better served by apprenticeships, community college training, working in an industry to learn the business, then starting their own, etc., etc.  Matt has made quite a cogent case for those who are gifted writers to write rather than matricule.  I agree with all that.  The part with which I do not agree is this:

I think it was ninth grade, or maybe tenth, and I was sitting in afterschool detention. I’d been sentenced to hard time for being late to class, even though I had a valid excuse. See, I was only late because I hated school with a burning passion. I dreaded every class, every assignment, every test, every worksheet, every mound of busywork, every shallow and forced interaction with peers I couldn’t relate to or connect with or understand; every moment, every second, every part, every inch of every aspect of my public educational experience. I hated it. I hated all of it. I was suffocating.

It had been ten years of public school up to that point and it wasn’t getting better. It never would, and I knew it. I was able to hang on for a long time, managing adequate grades, even an ‘A’ here and there. I was “passing,” at the very least. But in high school that changed. I started failing and failing miserably. We’d take tests, I’d try my hardest, but often I’d still get zero answers correct. ZERO. Fifty questions — all wrong. It was humiliating. Eventually I earned a reputation. I was the kid who “didn’t care” and “didn’t assert himself.” I decided to go with that image — false though it was – because I’d rather be seen as the smart slacker than exposed as the moron who actually tried and still failed.

Wow. To my way of thinking, based on Matt’s very articulate blog, this is more an indictment of the government school education system than of any lack of ability on Matt’s part. We ran into any number of situatons during our homeschool years where we were frustrated our kids were not learning.  The kids were frustrated, too.  Sometimes we found a way to work around it and sometimes we fought through it just to get to a minimum level of competence that was “good enough.”  It seems to me that our society needs to educate our children to a certain level of competence whether they plan to be a PhD rocket surgeon, a millworker, a beautician, or a lawyer before they start into career training.  Probably it should only take until about eighth grade, but the government steals an extra four years of our kids lives and still cannot get the material into their heads.

So, I think the answer to students like Matt might be to try a different approach.  That is one of the things for which homeschool is better suited than any other learning environment about which I am aware.  There are probably others, but I think we are hammering a lot of round kids into square holes these days.  I am glad we got our kids out of the system sufficiently early that they did not have to suffer like Matt.

Betty Blonde #48 – 09/22/2008
Betty Blonde #48
Click here or on the image to see full size strip.

My favorite government school teacher responds

Day 825 of 1000
Betty Blonde #9 – 07/29/2008
Betty Blonde #9
Click here or on the image to see full size strip.

Yesterday I wrote a post about a ridiculous event, reported by World Magazine, that happened at a government school in Indianpolis.  It was suggested this event was due to problems with the Common Core standards being imposed by the (to paraphrase Wayne LaPierre of the NRA) “jack-booted government school thugs” from the Federal Department of Education.  My favorite government school teacher (and cousin), Trisha, disabused me of that notion with the following commentary posted as a comment to the offending blog post.

That curriculum was a problem at the District Level not a Common Core problem. I see this over and over again. Each district implements the Common Core based on their own understanding of it and often choose terrible a terrible curriculum to implement it. I do agree there is a problem with a “one size fits all” standard. I think the lower students suffer the most in this instance because no matter what they are expected to have mastered all of the standards for that grade level by the end of the year. Sometimes students are not developmentally ready for the grade they are in or the curriculum being taught. Higher students have more options that I see. For instance I have a student from a lower grade coming to my class for math and to an upper grade for reading. If the district is asking you to put all students in a box w/o differentiating there is an issue w/ the district or the state. The curriculum is a HUGE issue though. Districts and even states don’t spend enough time doing research into finding a quality curriculum. At our school they have purchased so many different curriculum’s over the years our basement is full of them. They really didn’t do the research and wasted a lot of money. Also, if you decide upon a curriculum teachers really need to be given the time to study it so it can be taught effectively. As for Common Core, every state has always had its own standards, and they are always flawed. Read the Common Core standards before forming an opinion though… because how they are implemented is many times based on a teacher, administrator, or districts opinion of what the standards say, and sometimes that is wayyyyyy off of reality.

I called her on the phone, mostly to see if I was going to be shut out of the house at the next family get-together, but also to talk about what she wrote.  Thankfully, she is in full agreement with the idea that whether the problem about which I wrote is a result of Federal involvement or government school ignorance or malfeasence, the Feds have no useful role in public education.

Update:  Oops.  I almost forgot.  You can read Trisha’s awesome blog here.

An encouraging government school story

Day 766 of 1000

My cousin Trisha sent me a very encouraging story from Utah about government high school football.  There is a second article about it here.  I need to disclaim that while I am a product of the government school system and played four years of high school football, I am neither a fan of government school nor publicly funded high school sports.  Both seem to do a lot of damage to the youth of America, but that is a post for another day.  This is a story about a coach who disbanded his football team and was supported by the parents for doing it.  Here are the basics, but the whole article is worth a read:

So when Matt Labrum, head football coach at Union High School in Roosevelt, Utah, suspended his entire team — all 80 of them — last week, can you guess what was coming next from parents of those suddenly former players?

If you figure Labrum got his head handed to him as he heard call after call for his immediate dismissal, you’d be incorrect.

Believe it or not, Labrum says he’s received no ill will from moms and dads for his radical disciplinary move — and that has everything to do with the off-field problems that fueled the total team suspension (e.g., bad attitudes toward teachers, skipping classes, failing grades, and a serious allegation of cyberbullying) and his desire to correct  them.

So Labrum told the players to turn in their jerseys — if they wanted to wear them again, they’d each have to earn the right to do so by jumping through an arduous series of hoops, including extensive community service…

An event like this happened in our high school, but it was not followed up with an effort by the coach to help any of the players get their act together.  I was one of only two seniors on the team who did not get kicked off.  I was one of the privileged kids who made all the teams and got to play, but I still have a sour taste in my mouth for the predominately horrible public school sports envirnonment at a time when kids do not know how to read nor do math when they graduate.  Still, this is very impressive.  The coaches have rolled up their sleeves and are working with the players on something that actually might build a little character and academic achievement.

A liberal rag makes the case against government high school sports?

This has been one of my pet peeves for a long time.  It is nuts that we pay for high school sports.  PE is one thing, but as the article says, “The United States routinely spends more tax dollars per high-school athlete than per high-school math student—unlike most countries worldwide.”  I don’t really care how other countries worldwide are funding sports vs. school because it does not seem like they are so hot either.  Nevertheless, I say let the parents and sports boosters pay for the kids to play.

Education in the West

Day 111 of 1000

The kid’s friends, Mike and Nestor, came over to the house yesterday to study for their multi-variable calculus test for 4-5 hours.  I got to talk to them a bit.  Both of them want to be engineers, but neither of them took a traditional educational path, Nestor having come to the U.S. a few years ago and Mike having taken some extended time in Iraq.  They are both impressive people and they work very hard at hard classes. My Russian buddy, Stepan and his wife are leaning hard toward what he calls “Home Education” for his two daughters.  After looking it over they have decided they do not want the educational system, public or private, to get their hands on his daughters. 

Then Eric G. sent me a link to an article on the bankruptcy of the Western educational system.  The article, titled “Educated” people, is spot on.  There is lots of stuff like this in the article:

We are not where we are because we were privileged; oh no. We got ahead because we work harder and just had a knack for that education thing.

This forgets of course that education in the United States and Europe at this point is a certification program more than anything else. It tests basic intelligence in some areas; in other areas, such as the liberal arts, it increasingly tests nothing but political allegiance and the ability to recite dogma in different forms (such “A Feminist Analysis of Cetacean Symbolism in Public Policy”).

Even in the sciences, we do not test intelligence so much as obedience, memorization and application of rote. This enables us to stop relying on smart people and to instead promote lots of interchangeable cogs. 

I completely resonate with that whole quote.  The problem now is to figure out how to educate one’s kids rather than “Educate” them in the sense described at the Amerika blog.  Every day, we are more thankful we homeschooled our kids.  We have turned more and more of the responsibility over to our kids.  We will try to help them, but they will increasingly have to navigate the educational morass on their own.  I wish I knew the answer.

School kills creativity?

I noticed that Luke has linked to one of our posts from the Other Posts of Note section of the Sonlight blog (Thanks Luke!).  He has a link there titled What are Other Posts of Note?  I followed a link in that explanation to a post at the Molding Minds Homeschool blog.  There was a wildly interesting education video embedded there.  I have embedded it here.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén